Remixing God: A Special Theology of Relativity
Part One
When Einstein theorized that space and time were not constants but were relative to the observer, no doubt there would have been those who dismissed his views as crazy talk. It can be hard to understand what he meant; he wrote and talked in terms of speeds and distances that are beyond our perceptive capabilities. Well, while unlikely to position me as a modern genius, the following article may similarly come off reading like the wacky ramblings of a nut-job as I try to understand, through the act of writing, God, no less.
More specifically, I am trying to get my head around my personal reunification with God and how I came to it by inventing my own theory of a Relative God and a Relative Truth.
Let’s start here:
If time, which we cannot experience as anything other than linear, is in fact not linear at all and also not separate from space (which, I believe – although I could have the whole thing wrong – is what Einstein hypothesized), then why can’t Truth be relative too?
Just because we can only perceive truth in certain patterns or manifestations doesn’t mean that these manifestations of truth or fact are invariable. And for that matter, what does ‘perceivable fact’ have to do with it anyway? It’s not like ‘the whole God thing’ has any historical basis in rational thought per se.
Existentialism, the term I prefer over the clunky ‘spirituality’, has more to do with emotions, mainly fear (of the unknown), and feelings of awe and wonder in the face of a big, beautiful, mystifying Universe.
Actually, no, we should really start back here:
I was brought up in a fundamentalist home where Truth was Truth as according to the Bible (or at least our particular Church’s interpretation of the Bible) and that was that.
This never sat well with me.
After doing a little research in the school library (no Internet then, crazy huh?), it seemed pretty obvious that on more than one occasion, entire civilizations have risen, prospered, declined and fallen without one single citizen thereof hearing diddly-squat about the Christian Gospel. Did those people, I enquired of the tall, wise ones in my life, go to Hell for worshiping false idols and otherwise failing to please the Christian God (who may or may not have been invented yet)?
The answer was “Yes, unless they accepted Jesus as their personal saviour, they went to Hell.”
“Well that seems hardly fair.”
“The Bible says that all people get a chance to hear the word of God and choose to repent before they die.”
“The word of Christ specifically?” I asked, just to clarify. “From the Bible?”
“Yes,” came the self-assured answer. Case closed…
…but not in my mind.
As if some indigenous American or Australian or Chinese people way-back-when, before Europeans started sticking their flags everywhere they weren’t wanted, ever got to hear about the Christian religion! What crap!
But what if it was true that all people got to hear the word of a Universal God, expressed through a variety of languages, and even other mediums beyond language like Love and through Nature? That sounds a lot easier to swallow doesn’t it? Unfortunately, I couldn’t hypothesize such heresies aloud growing up around Born Again Christians – they were, if nothing else, uncompromising in their vision.
Church or Breasts? That is the Question.
So after a childhood spent being alternately comforted by the presence of a loving, forgiving God and terrorized by a ferocious God who was champing at the bit to burn me (and keep burning me forever) for sneaking an extra slice of cheesecake behind Mum’s back, I eventually went mad with confusion over my burgeoning teenage sexuality.
Sensibly, I chose to take my chances and spend some time investigating the allure of female bumpy-bits over those pesky Christians and their square-bear ways. This decision came with an added bonus: sleeping in on Sundays. It was a no-brainer.
From then on I wanted nothing to do with religion or spirituality and gave myself over fully to hedonism.
This was all very well until my mid-twenties when the true nature of my mortality hit home like a very rude comment and I entered into a dark night of the soul. While I had no desire to return to the Church, I began to look around for a different kind of spirituality to help me to get right with my life…
Continued in Part Two
Pic by Smudgie’s Ghost


Funny post, I can relate to you on so much of it, I’m ready for part two now!
Well relativity is relative. E.g mass is invariably related to the speed of light in a fixed and quantifiable way.
Your fundamentalist friends hadn’t read Romans (it’s strange how fundamentalists neglect large parts of the Bible) about people judged by the light they have (origin of the expression ‘according to their lights’).
If truth is a fitting game, then there is relativity (what fits with what) but also invariance (no fit = no truth).
Looking forward to the next part.
haha. I had a similar questions growing up. I am so happy I didn’t have super religious parents. It really let me develop my own ideas about spirituality. My folks decided since it was shoved down their throats so much they didn’t want to force my sister and I into church. Cheers to thinking for ourselves!
@Lola – cheers mate
@Evan – you’re making my head spin there bro …
@Amber – lucky you, (although for public record despite the ‘born again thing’ my folks were lovely and loving and still are) and yes, cheers to free thought
I grew up in a very religious family. It didn’t really bother me till I was about 13 years old. From that time till about 17 I started to question and no one had any sort of reasonable answer.
The bonus is I have extensive knowledge of the Bible. Particularly the creation story in Genesis which I’ve thought about a lot in the light of many other religions and the myths of ancient civilizations and what they have to say. Genesis makes a lot of sense if it’s not read literally.
I particularly like the taking of the knowledge of good and bad that cased humanity out of paradise. To me this is no different from Taoist or Buddhist wisdom of making no distinctions created out of limited perspective, no limited subjective judgments and instead letting go and taking on big mind and living in peace.
I highly recommend a book called The Mind of God: Science and the Search for Ultimate Meaning written by Paul Davies, Professor of Natural Philosophy at the University of Adelaide.
We laugh at the fundies who defend their beliefs with menace and violence, but that when we look into ourselves, we find that energy exists in all of us. Try to give up a cherished belief or desire, and a visceral resistance comes up. My experience has be that Truth is not to be found in a belief in God; it is being present, here and now, that opens up the universe.
The way I understand Einstein (which I as well will not claim to do at any great length) it’s us that inject the relativity into the equation. time and space are constants an the observers take on these massive constants is the relative part. a 4th dimensional being (if one indeed exists) would perceive time in a far different way than we three dimensional beings do. yet we would both observing the same phenomenon.
Wittgenstein discussed what he called “family resemblance” common characteristics certain things have that we use to categorize them (group them together), yet were somehow unquantifiable by language. He uses the example of games.
perceivable fact therefore has everything to do with everything. All cultures across human history have maintained certain absolutes with a family resemblance (not that there are not exceptions).the only way to discover these absolutes is to observe and catagorize common elements. We get as close as possible to truth (as we are all observing the same thing) by maintaining a broad community made up of a variety of these “relative” perspectives on the constant universe.
But perhaps I’m getting ahead of your conclusion.
I like Descartes’ method of establising truth: sitting with dressing gown and pipe in front of his fire and pondering. And he came up with, ‘I think, therefore I am.’ And everything stemmed from that. Still does. So I’m with you, Seamus, truth is relative. It’s not out there, it’s in here.
[...] Continued from Part One [...]
[...] also partially fills in a gap in the Special Theology of Relativity series (which I will finish [...]
[...] Part Three (click here to go back to the start) [...]